For several years now I have been writing occasional pieces for this column. The first one I submitted was on my understanding of the term "liberal."
I have always called myself a liberal, even since Ronald Reagan began trashing the term. Liberal, I tried to explain, was something other than a philosophy of big government and high taxes. And it was quite distinct from tough individualism and unfettered capitalism. To be liberal meant to be generous, thoughtful and caring.
I was pleased, after the item was published, to see that it had brought forth a response, both angry and frivolous, from at least one reader. Some people, at least, read the "Lion and the Lamb"!
Now with the election of a president, described during the campaign as the most liberal of the senators (the critics completely overlooked the most liberal senator, representing Vermont, one Bernie Sanders. Sanders is a card-carrying socialist), we hear from all right wing sources complaints about big government liberalism.
Writing in the Op-Ed section of the New York Times, Timothy Ash undertakes to explore various definitions of liberal or liberalism. "Liberalism has become a pejorative term denoting — to put the matter a tad frivolously — some unholy marriage of big government and fornication....
"The weird usage leads, at the extreme, to book titles like Deliver Us From Evil: Defeating Terrorism, Despotism, and Liberalism."
Ash writes that the term "liberal" is vigorously attacked in France and much of eastern Europe. And there it means unregulated free-market capitalism, beloved by libertarians and fiscal conservatives. And sometimes the term neo-liberalism is used. (It does make a difference how one defines the term.)
In calling myself liberal, I was open to the charge of being a "tax and spend" Democrat. I was thought to be unaware of the real world, where it's everybody for themselves. YOYO — You're On Your Own is the true philosophy for real Americans.
Many years ago in Ohio I heard the late Senator Robert Taft describe himself as a "real liberal" because he believed that government ought not to take our money in excessive taxation. Liberals such as Taft, in those days of Roosevelt's New Deal, claimed that the only good government was less government; that it was unfair to tax the rich at a higher rate than to tax the middle class or the poor; that it was a waste of good resources to offer "relief" to the poor.
For the last thirty years at least, Taft's arguments have largely been followed. Even centrist Bill Clinton, Democrat, proclaimed, "The era of big government is over."
In China, "Liberalism means everything the government does not like" ...the term is used to attack those who advocate further market-oriented economic reform. In India a "liberal" father is one who allows his children to choose whom they wish to marry.
One response in this country to the attack on "liberalism" has been to change terms. Abandon the "liberal" and adopt "progressive." I have no quarrel with using the newer term; it too has a noble history, dating back to the early 20th century and "Fighting Bob" LaFollette, founder of the Progressive Party and movement. I still read The Progressive, a monthly published in progressive Madison, Wisconsin.
When asked, during the campaign, whether she was a liberal, Hillary Clinton replied, "I prefer the term progressive, which has a real American meaning." (Liberal, therefore, must be unreal, or un-American, or both?)
To me, a Christian, "liberal" springs from Jesus' second great commandment. He commands me to love my neighbor as I love myself. My neighbor is everyone. He may be my friend or my enemy. I must love him. I must try to find a job for him; I must vote for better school funding for his children; I must love him and wish him well, even though I may not like him.
This, I believe, makes me a liberal. And I am happy to have a president who, though he may not use the term, is indeed a liberal. Timothy Ash concludes, "Then, perhaps in his second term, he might dare to rescue the word."
Columns
February 3, 2009
LION AND THE LAMB: What is a liberal anyway?
- Columns
-
-
GARY'S WORLD: Thank our veterans this weekend
A tremendous opportunity presents itself in our community this weekend — an opportunity to honor those who served in the Vietnam War. Personally, after attending last year's first Welcome Home celebration, I wouldn't want to miss this. It was an emotional event for both Vietnam veterans and ordinary citizens. It was a great way to commemorate Vietnam Veterans Day in Tennessee, March 29.
-
RANDOM THOUGHTS: "Antiques Roadshow" comes to Tennessee
If you are one of the 10 million who watch each episode of the “Antiques Roadshow” mark your calendar. The three upcoming Mondays, March 30, April 6 and April 13, were all taped in Chattanooga last July.
- LION AND THE LAMB: An open letter to Sharon Baier I was happy to read your well-written article, printed in last week's Chronicle. It makes a strong case, in the story of Al and Jennifer, that "To make money, you have to spend money." That misguided couple thought that they ought to cut down on their purchase of supplies, to save money. They did so, week after week, until they lost their business.
- WE THE PEOPLE: Veterans storm the Hill When young men and women risk their lives and sacrifice both physical and mental health for their country, a grateful country should at least provide them with shelter, food, and health care. But there is a lot of hypocrisy between what some windbag says on Veterans Day and what the country actually does for veterans.
-
THEREFORE I AM: Kids stress out parents? Well, duh!
This just in: According to an expert, children can add stress and strain to a marriage. In other news, further expert studies have indicated that the sky is in fact blue, Paris Hilton is a tad spoiled, peanut butter and chocolate taste great together, and the Middle East has issues. Thank goodness we have experts to tell us these things.
-
INSIDE THE FIRST AMENDMENT: With shekels come shackles
When President Obama launched his faith-based initiative at the National Prayer Breakfast on Feb. 5, he promised not only to sustain the Bush administration’s signature domestic program — but to expand it.
-
THEREFORE I AM: Jim Croce and I will keep you safe and sound
My philosophy of life is simple: When in doubt, follow the advice of a dead folk-rock star. I always found Jim Croce to be particularly handy in this capacity. Don’t tug on Superman’s cape. Don’t spit into the wind. Don’t pull the mask off that old Lone Ranger, and regardless of how badly you may want to, do not, under any circumstances, mess around with Jim.
- STUMPTALK: Stimulating a war on prosperity and freedom Near Bush’s sunset, Treasury Secretary Paulson and Fed chairman Bernanke terrified the nation with “the sky’s falling and America is doomed” unless the government steps in with new regulations, institutional takeovers and massive lending.
- WE THE PEOPLE: Thoughts on bringing a recession to heel Responding to the recent full-throated baying of conservative “economic watchdogs,” I slogged into the swamp of their icon Adam Smith’s murky tome, “The Wealth of Nations,” to see if they had finally treed anything of value.
-
LION AND THE LAMB: Reality
Dim blue of early morning shines into the living room
while you flip through television channels. - More Columns Headlines
-





