CROSSVILLE —
Politically conservative agendas may range from supporting war to opposing welfare. But are there consistent underlying motivations? What can psychology tell us about the way we think?
Four researchers who culled through 50 years of research literature about the psychology of conservatism report that at the core of political conservatism is the resistance to change and a tolerance for inequality, and that some of the common psychological factors linked to political conservatism include:
• A sense of fear and feeling threatened
• Intolerance of ambiguity
• Uncertainty avoidance
"From our perspective, these psychological factors are capable of contributing to the adoption of conservative ideological contents, either independently or in combination," the researchers wrote in an article published in the American Psychological Association's Psychological Bulletin.
The researchers looked at patterns involving 22,818 participants, taken from material originating from 12 countries (including the U.S.) that included speeches and interviews given by politicians, opinions and verdicts rendered by judges, as well as experimental, field and survey studies. Ten calculations performed on the material — which included various types of concepts and approaches from different countries and groups — yielded consistent, common threads, the researchers said.
The avoidance of uncertainty, for example, as well as the striving for certainty, is particularly tied to one key dimension of conservative thought — the resistance to change and a tendency to support the status quo, they said. Many conservatives appear to shun and even punish those who threaten the status of cherished conservative positions, they wrote.
Concern with fear and threat, likewise, has been linked to a second key dimension of conservatism — a tolerance for inequality, a view reflected in the Indian caste system, South African apartheid and the conservative politics in the US. According to the researchers, conservatives share a resistance to change and a greater acceptance of inequality in terms of race or income.
While most people resist change, the researchers said, liberals appear to have a higher tolerance for change and uncertainty than conservatives do. Liberals also tend to be less dogmatic and to feel less threatened.
As for conservatives' penchant for accepting inequality, they said, one contemporary example is liberals' general endorsement of extending rights and liberties to disadvantaged minorities compared to conservatives' opposing position.
The researchers found that being intolerant of ambiguity is associated with such conservative characteristics as unwavering certainty and strong loyalty to particular people and positions. This intolerance of ambiguity can lead conservatives to cling to the familiar, to arrive at premature conclusions, and to impose simplistic clichés and stereotypes.
Conservatives don't feel the need to jump through complex, intellectual hoops in order to understand or justify some of their positions. They are more comfortable seeing and stating things in black and white, the researchers concluded
An important component of conservative psychology is repressed or displaced fear and the related sense of feeling threatened by various events, ideas and people around them. Conservatives often report feeling threatened by what they view as the “liberal media” or “ atheists” who they see as attacking them and jeopardizing their place in society. This often produces an anger response as a defense mechanism against the perceived threat. Anger expressed toward such people as homosexuals or Muslims is related to displaced fear and is a significant factor in understanding conservative psychology according to the researchers. It should be noted that the ultimate fear is the fear of death and a very strong desire to achieve life after death is particularly important in understanding the psychology of many religious conservatives.
We all like to believe that our politics is based on rational thought, but the truth is that our politics comes from a much deeper place that we need to acknowledge. Our subconscious minds play a bigger role in our political beliefs than many of us would like to admit. Our early childhood experiences, our relationship with our parents, how we cope with fear, and how we respond to authority figures all play a role in our political views. Instead of simply declaring what we believe in, we need to explore why we believe as we do. If we want to understand politics, we must first try to understand ourselves.
• • •
This column represents alternative thoughts to other published columns in the Crossville Chronicle. "We the People" is published each Wednesday. Opinions expressed in "We the People" columns are not necessarily those of the Crossville Chronicle publisher, editor or staff. For more information, contact John Wund, editor, at jwund@frontiernet.net.
Opinion
We the People: The Psychology of Conservatism
- Opinion
-
-
LION AND THE LAMB: More than meets the eye
It was a quiet Saturday afternoon, and my wife Sheral suggested I join her on a shopping trip. In Crossville Sheral went inside a store and I stayed outside looking at the bargain specials. My mind was in neutral, so I almost missed the little boy’s question. He was about seven or eight, evidently had just seen his first Amish family, and they had seemed very strange to him.
-
WE THE PEOPLE: No time to govern
Bob Dole’s tribute to George McGovern at the time of his death last year was both beautiful and touching. Speaking of the friendship they shared and the work they did together during their time in the Senate and later in retirement, Dole said McGovern “was one of the finest public servants I ever had the privilege to know.” He went on to say that they knew what they had in common was far more important than their different political philosophies.
-
TIDBITS: Be wary of home improvement shows
Sometimes I think home improvement stores need a screening tool of some sort, perhaps some kind of licensing or reference check. For example, before one can walk in and buy that handy dandy table saw, they need three people to vouch that they aren’t likely to cut off a bodily appendage.
-
STUMPTALK: Obama’s Benghazi betrayal
“Betrayal” is an ugly word. “To fail or desert especially in a time of need.” Those who pay attention to the actions of Obama are justified in saying we have been betrayed. Think about the IRS and DOJ debacles. Clearly our ambassador and his staff at the Benghazi consulate were betrayed, deserted in their time of mortal need. Obama allowed them to be murdered.
-
Lion and the Lamb: When schools go beyond the three Rs
The three Rs, reading, ‘riting and ‘rithmetic, have always been at the foundation of education in Cumberland County. Recently, however, a fourth R has been added — religion. In permission was granted representatives of The Gideons International to distribute Bibles to fifth-graders in the Brown Elementary School in Crossville, and this took place April 11.
-
We the People: Your vote — use it or lose it
A powerful faction within the Republican Party is determined to downsize our federal government. They want to reshape programs that originated to protect common folks like us.
-
Stumptalk: The elephant in the room
I recently saw video footage of the president surrounded by the heads of all the services; they had assembled to address the continuing and scandalous problem of sexual harassment in the armed forces. The elephant in the room, of course, was young women in the military serving in close quarters with young men.
-
We the People: Reality check, anyone?
Harry Truman had a birthday anniversary in early May. Harry was proud of being from the “show me” state. Republicans who aspire to stop all progress and set the clock back should take a lesson from Truman. He did something besides complain and obstruct progress.
-
The Lion and the Lamb: The devil and the IRS
National news these past several weeks has focused on a scandal in the Internal Revenue Service. IRS agents have been targeting Tea Party and other conservative groups for additional scrutiny when they applied for tax-exempt status. As this story developed over the past several weeks, however, it has become apparent that the IRS problem is much greater than the complaints raised by the Tea Party.
-
Tidbits: What's in a name?
Being born in the time before routine ultrasounds, my parents thought I was going to be a boy. I'm not sure if mom was carrying high or low, or if the wedding ring on a string went one way or the other, or what other old wives tale was used to determine I would be a he rather than a she, but that's what they thought and that's how they prepared.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
LION AND THE LAMB: More than meets the eye
James Gandolfini Dies at Age 51
Fmr. TWA Flight 800 Investigators Want New Probe
Raw: Heat, Spurs Back on Court Ahead of Game 7
Dolce and Gabbana Convicted of Tax Evasion
Paris, Prince Depositions Used in Jackson Trial
Coiffed Cattle Get Their Close-up
In Berlin, Obama Channels Cold War Activism
Police at Patriots Tight End's Home for 2nd Day
Fed Suggests Bond Purchases Could Slow
AP: DOJ Broke Own Rules Seizing Phone Records
Raw: Baby White Rhino Debuts at Australian Zoo
Time Lapse: Rebuilding Bridge Post-collapse
Ohio Woman Accuses 3 of Holding Her Captive
Hunt for Ex-Teamster Boss Hoffa's Remains Ends
