CROSSVILLE —
Tennesseans by nature and by history are independent and this flows over into the voting habits of the majority of Cumberland Countians. While we exist under a two party system, the "yellow dog Democrats" and the "dye-in-the-wool" Republicans are in the minority.
The majority of us still have this crazy idea that we want to "vote for the man" as opposed to voting for the party and such has been the tradition of Tennessee elections for decades. And so it is in Cumberland County.
We recognize many who have moved here came from states that have closed primaries where only card-carrying, oath swearing party faithfuls can vote.
We are not opposed to that, if it is the wishes of the majority of Tennesseans. However, the very nature of Tennessee primaries is that voters have the option of voting for friends, co-workers and acquaintances, or for "the best man," if they wish.
Any veteran politician in Cumberland County will tell you a local candidate cannot win without votes from both sides. This is the way we have conducted our elections for decades and this is the accepted custom of the polling place.
We are against one person being singled out and denied the right to vote for people they had told they would cast a ballot. And that is what happened Monday and Tuesday of this week.
Mickey Eldridge is a very fine, outstanding citizen of this community whose good works as field representative for Congressman Jim Cooper when he represented us, and since as a supporter of senior citizens and their issues, as a community activist and as executive director of Cumberland Good Samaritans, are unapproachable.
She was pulled out of line, her voting paper taken from her hand and was told her right to vote in the Republican Primary was being challenged by Linda Thompson, a poll watcher and aunt of state Rep. Eric Swafford.
This was an absolute slap in the face of all Cumberland Countians who hold dear the right to vote their conscience in an election.
It is even more so when one considers that Swafford voted Democratic for years prior to seeking the state representative job and given that fact, ten years ago under his rules could not have voted for himself.
If Eric Swafford wanted to change the way Tennesseans vote in primaries and keep primary elections closed, then he could have introduced legislation to make primaries open to only card carrying party members ... he has had how many years to do this?
Yet, he only chooses to challenge a voter when it appears he is in trouble. This is an attempt at intimidating others to not cross over into the Republican Primary and while it may be legally right, morally, it is wrong.
After the first two days of early voting, 80 percent of the ballots cast were in the Republican Primary. It was clear that cross-over voting was taking place. We know first hand that local Democratic Party, leaders including one high-ranking county party official, voted in the Republican Primary unchallenged.
So why was Mrs. Eldridge singled out? Her husband voted in the Republican Primary and was not challenged. We can only guess as to the motive for that action.
Let it be clear. This was not the work of the local Republican Party and nearly all party members we have talked with have distanced themselves from this action, and condemned it.
And finally, was the three-member judges panel appointed by Aaron Snodderly, chairman of the local Republican Party, a fair and impartial group or were they instructed on how to act if and when a challenge was issued?
The idea that Snodderly appointed his younger brother as a judge is appalling. The fact young Snodderly asked Eldridge how she was going to vote in the General Election illustrates this point. How can someone who has such limited experience with elections and polling places sit in judgment of someone who has voted for over three decades?
At least one of the judges questioned Mrs. Eldridge's motives for voting in the primary. Is "motive" a legitimate reason to take someone's right to vote for the person they wish away? The law only requires Mrs. Eldridge to take an oath of allegiance to the party, which she did.
We feel certain that this action was only taken in a desperate move to stop the flow of cross-over voters by sending a chill. It is an intimidation factor to prevent people from voting their conscience and for who they believe to be the best candidate.
Do not let this single action intimidate you into avoiding the primary you wish to vote in, or worse, keep you from voting at all. If ever there was an important time to vote, it is now. Voters need to look long and hard at the candidates, and they need to look long and hard at what has happened this week, and then exercise their right to vote for whom they deem to be the best person for the job, whether it be governor, state representative or county commissioner.
Cumberland County voters can send a message this primary election that we won't tolerate these tactics.
Opinion
Editorial: Don't let intimidation keep you from voting
- Opinion
-
-
An American tragedy?
I knew a bond trader. Not well, but well enough to pity the man. Money was his only measure of worth. On a good day (if he made a lot of money), he was ecstatic. On a bad one, he was morose. He could be pleasant in conversation at times, but now and then he would appear clueless about the broader range of human experience. Although he was rich (by my standard, at least), there was something shallow and tawdry about his life.
-
A creative retelling of history
A wonderful film, “42,” has been showing at the Rocky Top theater in Crossville the last several weeks. It takes us back to 1947 when the lives of two Methodists, Branch Rickey and Jackie Robinson, first intertwined.
-
Stumptalk: A super majority legislature
Much media attention has recently been focused on the inability of the super majority of Republicans in the 2013 legislature to enact every Republican bill into law. Why is this different from some of the recent super majority Democratic legislatures? If you were paying attention to the debates in the committees, and analyze that debate, you will find that Republicans don’t automatically follow their party leaders when it comes to doing what each individual legislator thinks is best for Tennessee. Republicans actually try to do what they think is best for our citizens.
-
Tidbits: Jolie’s move a conversation starter
Angelina Jolie, named the “Sexiest Woman in the World” by People Magazine in 2005, stunned the nation last week when she revealed she had chosen to have a preventative mastectomy after genetic testing revealed she had about an increased risk of developing breast cancer.
-
LION AND THE LAMB: Ten years in captivity
Traditionally male violence against women has been delivered by fist or gun. On May 6, however, another delivery system was brought to light: chains and rope.
-
WE THE PEOPLE: Crashing those Pearly Gates
Too often when one of our “public servants” dies, even if he is a blot on the human race, he is elevated to sainthood before they can get a tag on his toe. Then the press eulogizes him right into heaven before St. Peter can check his credentials. Even those who are a bit skeptical of this revision of history tend to adopt a “forgive and forget” attitude. Margaret Thatcher’s recent death seems to indicate that the British are less forgiving and have a better memory.
-
TIDBITS: Practical advice for new grads
Another graduation season is upon us, and soon a new crop of young adults will head out into the world, full of hopes and dreams for the future.
-
STUMPTALK: The right to bear arms
The anti-gun activists are wacky as a June bug for their solutions to eliminate gun-violence. They have it backwards. Instead of going after those that perpetrate these despicable acts, they are mounting attacks on law-abiding citizens, restriction of access to firearms, limiting magazine size and universal background checks.
-
Small Town Girl: Britain's missing royalty
Last week, Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands, after a 33-year-reign, abdicated in favor of her son, the now-King Willem-Alexander. He is now the youngest monarch in Europe and is the first Dutch king in more than 120 years. One has to wonder how Prince Charles of England felt while attending the coronation ceremonies. After all, he has been waiting to inherit the English throne from his mother, Queen Elizabeth II, for over 60 years.
-
We the People: Minimum wage is not enough to live on
For folks too young or too unaware what has happened to our economy the past 30 years, here is an answer. Ronald Reagan, G.H.W. Bush and the Republican Party are responsible for what we know as "Reaganomics," an economy that continues today resulting in few "labor unions” and the resulting low wages and lack of worker benefits.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
An American tragedy?



