When Energy Secretary Steven Chu, Transportation Secretary Roy LaHood and EPA administrator Lisa Jackson tried the old “cap and trade” shell game on Capitol Hill the other day (4-22-09) they tried to pass the mess off as a “jobs bill.” Jackson said, “This is a jobs bill and it is a jobs bill that focuses our country’s energy on the growth industry of the future.” But then one of those pesky conservatives, Rep. Joe Barton, asked just how this Jackson cost estimate could be presented when Ms. Jackson admitted she had not even read the bill. Ms. Jackson replied, “We had to make assumptions” meaning it makes an a** out of you and me, I guess. In Ms. Jackson’s “preliminary analysis” the cap and trade “pea” would cost the average American household $98-$140/yr. Unfortunately, or fortunately for normal Americans, most academic studies disagree because they followed the “pea.” MIT Professor John Reilly’s study of the far more lenient Warner-Lieberman Energy Bill, for example, would cost the average American household $3900 in higher energy costs and taxes.
Secretary LaHood utilizing his wisdom stated carbon taxes would create” green jobs” although no one has defined the term “green jobs” just yet. Another example of this is yet another academic study of eco-leftist rhetoric which indicates there is no standard definition of what a “green job” is and most other studies which try to show “green job” creation ignore other jobs lost by energy taxes.
Our “wiz” president loves to use Spain as an example of the “green jobs” future, but a recent study by researchers at Universidad Rey Carlos shows the for each green job created in Spain’s renewable energy industry, 2.2 jobs were destroyed elsewhere in the economy; apparently the Spanish can follow the “pea” better than Americans!
Now let us use a little common sense here. In this competitive world one would think that if carbon taxes actually had a chance of working the entire world would jump on the band wagon. Well, those with more common sense than this administration show the opposite reaction. China said they would never sacrifice their economic growth to reduce carbon emissions and India chimed in with the trade-off between economic growth and carbon emissions is morally wrong.
A strange thing historically occurs when poor countries become rich countries; their carbon emissions go down. Amazing! There is that nasty “COMMON SENSE” thing again! Now if we all too wise Americans could just figure out how to tax the oceans of the world for it is they who factually emit 90+ percent of the earth’s carbon dioxide…
Opinion
STUMPTALK: Washington and that pesky common sense thing
- Opinion
-
-
Gary's World: The magical Star Wars summer of '77
A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away...
-
Lion and the Lamb: When politics and religion meet
Several wealthy contributors to the Republican presidential campaign are once again trying to figure out how they can use a video clip containing three words that the Rev. Jeremiah Wright used in a sermon on April 13, 2003. Wright, now retired, had been pastor of the 6,600-member Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago when Barack Obama was a member there.
-
Random Thoughts: Returning vets fight fire
Cemeteries are given special attention this week in preparation for Memorial Day next Monday. During the Civil War gracious ladies of the south laid flowers on the graves of fallen soldiers from both sides. The custom spread across the country and was called Decoration Day until the early 20th century.
-
Tidbits: Finding more time in your day
If we had another two hours in every day, we'd all probably still be begging for just a little bit more to get all our stuff done before that clock strikes midnight and it's game over.
-
Stumptalk: Hooray for the innovators
In his brilliant article in the Free Market, Daniel Sanchez says, “There will always be a one-percent. The well-being of the 99-percent depends on who makes up the 1-percent: innovative entrepreneurs or the state and its cronies. This in turn depends on the ideologies adopted by the 99-percent.” This is the way societies have always been organized and always will be.
-
GARY'S WORLD: Graduates, create your own opportunities
Time flies. One day you have a baby boy who is fascinated with stuffed Miss Piggy and Kermit rattles and the next day he wants to wear his cowboy boots and hat with every outfit no matter what the occasion. Before you know it, he's playing in the elementary school band, going into high school, learning how to drive, driving to school, going to prom and graduating.
-
RANDOM THOUGHTS: Truly a January in May
“It’s June in January” became a popular standard after Bing Crosby introduced the song in 1934. A strange thing happened last week. I call it a tale of ‘It’s January in May.’
-
LION AND THE LAMB: Our challenged nation
Three major social justice issues have been a source of contention in our nation over the years, and interestingly, each of them has involved the subject of equality.
-
WE THE PEOPLE: Repressing the ‘Grapes of Wrath’
Sometimes a hole appears, ever so briefly, in the curtain that hides the plans of those who control our government. One such opening occurred when Alan Greenspan testified to the Federal Reserve Board on Feb. 26, 1997. During that testimony, Greenspan revealed that “worker insecurity” was (in his view) a boon to the economy, allowing productivity to increase without causing workers to demand increased earnings.
-
TIDBITS: Never stop moving forward, grads
This week is a week of celebration. According to my files of graduating seniors, Cumberland County will see more than 550 students earning their high school diplomas this week. Now, those youngsters will venture out into the world, armed with the knowledge and character instilled in them by their parents, brothers, sisters, cousins, aunts, uncles, teachers, principals, classmates, coaches and others.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
Gary's World: The magical Star Wars summer of '77


