Reform of our increasingly dysfunctional health care system is becoming one of the top political issues. All sides are jumping into the fray, resulting (perhaps intentionally on the part of some players) in some confusing and misleading proposals.
The health insurance industry is running scared, afraid of losing its near-dominant role in health care financing. (See my article in April 15 Chronicle, “How good is your health insurance?") These private for-profit insurers have now offered — and possibly reneged on their offer — to reduce health care expenditures by $2 trillion over the next 10 years. That would be a $200 billion reduction each year, or a saving of about $2,500 per year for a family of four. This would be accomplished by reducing the growth rate of health care expenditures by 1.5 percent.
This proposal raises a number of questions:
1. Why are they waiting until now, when under pressure and antagonism, to essentially admit that their profits have been unconscionable and unsustainable?
2. The reduction in insurance premiums would still not make health insurance affordable for millions of Americans. Average health care expenditure is now close to $8,000 per person per year.
3. How large a government bureaucracy will be required to monitor that they actually fulfill their promise? They obviously want the government to stay out of their business.
But the health insurance industry, after years of fighting any regulation by government, have seen the light and are actually consenting to some government regulation! They claim to agree to offer health insurance equally to all comers at comparable premiums without regard to health status (“pre-existing conditions”), age, or sex.
Remember that the primary legal obligation of private health insurance companies is to ensure profits for investors. What will be the response of investors if their dividends are reduced?
It is apparent that this is a last-ditch effort of health insurance companies to save their hides for a few more years.
The most comprehensive proposal for health care reform is for adoption of the single-payer program, under which the government would serve as the insurance carrier for all Americans, while leaving ownership, administration and employment under private control. A few years ago, while in Congress, President Obama supported such a system, but apparently has more recently concluded that it is politically not possible at present.
Somewhere in the middle of the above two proposals is the prospect of a dual private/public health care system. Each individual could choose. If the private health insurance is working satisfactorily, it could be continued. Or any individual would be free to opt for a Medicare-like public insurance plan, financed through the graduated income tax as well as premiums. Some public funds would be available for both plans to make them affordable.
There is an assumption that over time there would be a preponderance of persons gravitating to the public system, which in all likelihood would be more comprehensive, more efficient, and less expensive. The risk is that relatively healthy individuals with minimal health care needs would opt for the private system, leaving the public system for the frequent and expensive users. The opposition of the private insurance industry to this proposal seems to indicate their belief that they would ultimately lose business.
Discussion of our failing health care system and possible remedies is likely to dominate news for the next few months. In such a situation there is always pressure to just do something, Let’s make sure that what we do is right for all of us.
Opinion
LION AND THE LAMB: Health care proposal raises questions
- Opinion
-
-
Gary's World: The magical Star Wars summer of '77
A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away...
-
Lion and the Lamb: When politics and religion meet
Several wealthy contributors to the Republican presidential campaign are once again trying to figure out how they can use a video clip containing three words that the Rev. Jeremiah Wright used in a sermon on April 13, 2003. Wright, now retired, had been pastor of the 6,600-member Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago when Barack Obama was a member there.
-
Random Thoughts: Returning vets fight fire
Cemeteries are given special attention this week in preparation for Memorial Day next Monday. During the Civil War gracious ladies of the south laid flowers on the graves of fallen soldiers from both sides. The custom spread across the country and was called Decoration Day until the early 20th century.
-
Tidbits: Finding more time in your day
If we had another two hours in every day, we'd all probably still be begging for just a little bit more to get all our stuff done before that clock strikes midnight and it's game over.
-
Stumptalk: Hooray for the innovators
In his brilliant article in the Free Market, Daniel Sanchez says, “There will always be a one-percent. The well-being of the 99-percent depends on who makes up the 1-percent: innovative entrepreneurs or the state and its cronies. This in turn depends on the ideologies adopted by the 99-percent.” This is the way societies have always been organized and always will be.
-
GARY'S WORLD: Graduates, create your own opportunities
Time flies. One day you have a baby boy who is fascinated with stuffed Miss Piggy and Kermit rattles and the next day he wants to wear his cowboy boots and hat with every outfit no matter what the occasion. Before you know it, he's playing in the elementary school band, going into high school, learning how to drive, driving to school, going to prom and graduating.
-
RANDOM THOUGHTS: Truly a January in May
“It’s June in January” became a popular standard after Bing Crosby introduced the song in 1934. A strange thing happened last week. I call it a tale of ‘It’s January in May.’
-
LION AND THE LAMB: Our challenged nation
Three major social justice issues have been a source of contention in our nation over the years, and interestingly, each of them has involved the subject of equality.
-
WE THE PEOPLE: Repressing the ‘Grapes of Wrath’
Sometimes a hole appears, ever so briefly, in the curtain that hides the plans of those who control our government. One such opening occurred when Alan Greenspan testified to the Federal Reserve Board on Feb. 26, 1997. During that testimony, Greenspan revealed that “worker insecurity” was (in his view) a boon to the economy, allowing productivity to increase without causing workers to demand increased earnings.
-
TIDBITS: Never stop moving forward, grads
This week is a week of celebration. According to my files of graduating seniors, Cumberland County will see more than 550 students earning their high school diplomas this week. Now, those youngsters will venture out into the world, armed with the knowledge and character instilled in them by their parents, brothers, sisters, cousins, aunts, uncles, teachers, principals, classmates, coaches and others.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
Gary's World: The magical Star Wars summer of '77


